top of page

 

With the rise of importance in data, comes a loss of story telling as traumatic experiences are represented through soulless numbers: death counts, maps, graphs. The desire for fact has left the “first hand account” as un-relatable to the contemporary audience due to its temporal distance; listeners are isolated from the accounter and from the events accounted [1]. Moshe Safdie’s Yad Vashem dissolves the barrier between account and story in his Yad Vashem Holocaust Museum on a hill near Jerusalem. The building consists of a curated set of atmospheres that work towards the formation of a narrative, left open to personal interpretation by each visitor. Through narrative structure and experiential spaces, the building itself transcends the exhibition housed within gaining its own identity external to its “museumness”.

 

 

The narrative begins upon entering a long triangular prism containing the main exhibition space. Its axial nature draws visitors towards the end, the proverbial “light at the end of the tunnel” [4]; however, circulation towards the end condition zigzags across the axis into each flanking exhibition room. The prismatic central volume cants inwards towards its halfway point as the curatorial narrative reaches its climax. The intense circulatory control brings about an atmosphere of bondage and brutality mirroring the dark moment it wishes to preserve.

 

 

Throughout the main section of the museum light filters through skylights placed along the pinnacle of the prism and strategically the flanking rooms. The muted and reflected light adds somberness to the space, dissolving shadow as the contrast approaches zero. Pockets of intense light appear through the narrative, breaking through neutrality as events in prosaic flow, an oral story telling more than novel as these penetrations necessitate a monotonic background.

 

 

Brutality, coarseness, and monotony are translated into concrete, a plastic material, bending to the will of the narrative: curving here, punched-out there, and polished to a dampened sheen. The entire prismatic structure is constructed of this submissive material. The walls are left au-natural, pining to be touched and followed through the story: bristling with unexpected globules or restful smooth sections. The walls become as integral to the narrative as the space they enclose.

 

 

The opression of the prism ends with a crossover space, a circular planned dome hanging in a greater space. The volume feels monumental and airy, juxtaposing the past cramped and submissive spaces of the prism. Lungs open as though the dome was a breath of fresh air; the muted light that was once monotonous becomes ethereal. The concrete, smooth and reflective, becomes comforting in its earthliness after the difficult journey from the past exhibition. This room is the story’s dénouement as the narrator pauses momentarily, a liminal transfer between story and conclusion.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

 

 

YAD VASHEM - MOSHE SAFDIE

Plan

Plan

sections

sections

Prismatic

Prismatic

Skylight

Skylight

Double Dome

Double Dome

Concept sketches

Concept sketches

Framed View

Framed View

The site from above

The site from above

Lilly Pond

Lilly Pond

Describe your image here

Visitors break out of the prism momentarily as prepared by the transitional space. Here the concrete frames a view; lush green hills juxtapose the past singularity of material, a point of deceleration as a prelude to the spaces that follow. These spaces, all square in plan are constructed of stone, another earthly material asking to be touched. The square plans of the spaces are directly against the axiality and controlled fascism of the prism, the end of the narrative and the anti-climactic exhale as visitors exit.

 

The entire museum is not placed on its site but cuts through it, appearing as scar tissue against pristine skin [4], evidence of the narrative within. As a scar, only part of the narrative is revealed, the hill hiding the flanking interior spaces leaving traces only as skylights burst from the ground. This violent splitting of the hill also isolates the narrative within as a closed system of pure atmosphere. The museum comments on the interconnectedness of story, memory, and death. The data of mass death only speaks of fact and absolutes, snippets of event un-relatable in its non-temporality, outside of our understanding [3]. The first hand account is equally distant through our inability to experience that, which was another’s. Yad Vashem transcends the distinction, removing characters, plot and setting from the act of narration forming a series of embodied impressions forming the story. Memory is re-conceptualized in tandem to the material spectacle, subverting it through emotion lacking in the visual spectacle [2].Thus, Yad Vashem can be removed from Yad Vashem. The building stands alone as a container of a more powerful expressive tool than that which it holds.

 

Through the application of Atmospheric architectural techniques explored above, Moshe Safdie forms a deeply personal narrative, preserving the memory of the Holocaust in embodied experience. Visitors end their journey through the museum retaining the experience of the space over and above the material seen. The building is an individual, it speaks through the language of emotion.

[1] Benjamin, Walter, Hannah Arendt, and Harry Zohn. Illuminations. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968. Print.

[2] Debord, Guy. Society of the Spectacle. Eastbourne: Soul Bay, 2009. Print.

[3] Kant, Immanuel. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. New York: Liberal Arts, 1950. Print.

[4] Safdie, Moshe, Joan Ockman, and Diana Murphy. Yad Vashem: Moshe Safdie - the Architecture of Memory. Baden: Lars Müller, 2006. Print.

 

All images from:

Safdie, Moshe, Joan Ockman, and Diana Murphy. Yad Vashem: Moshe Safdie - the Architecture of Memory. Baden: Lars Müller, 2006. Print.

Josh Silver

bottom of page